Asian social systems and modes of management are being scrutinized because of the rapid economic growth of several East asian nations, which are frequently achieved using various methods than those of the neo-liberal dogma. To explain these differences and, in particular, to deflect criticism that such systems are illiberal or authoritarian, the” Asian values” thesis has been used. There are a number of assumptions that are difficult to support methodically, including the state that Asiatic values are the source of these triumphs. Assertions of determinism and causality are included in these.

The assertions about Eastern beliefs also reflect an internal conflict between Asian societies regarding opposing modernity viewpoints. These ideas are reflected in the tension between the need for individuals to reach their full potential and the need to sustain interpersonal purchase. These beliefs, which are promoted by opponents of Asiatic values, include difficult labor and frugality, educational achievements, balancing individual and societal requirements, and deference to authority. This pressure is also reflected in events like Aapi ( Asian American and Pacific Islander ) Heritage Month, which emphasize the importance of promoting historical traditions and promoting a sense of collective cluster well-being.

This paper examines whether these relation ideals are related to eudaimonic well-being, as defined by aspects of self-actualization, sense of purpose, and connections with people. Additionally, it examines whether higher levels of Asiatic values lessen the impact of race-related stress on emotional well-being. It is hypothesized that those who have a more inclusive worldview of cultural individuality who support Eastern values may be able to employ these values as cognitive tools when attacking racism because they are able to apply various coping strategies from different cultures.